View Single Post
  #84   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote:
wrote:
Howard Ferstler wrote:
MINe 109 wrote:

"Curvilinear"? Isn't that ML's way of trying to be more
Ferstler-approved by diddling the dispersion?

Actually, unless the diaphragm is changing size as it moves
back and forth, the curved shape will not allow for any
better dispersion than what we would get with a flat
diaphragm.



Guess again dimbulb.


YOU guess again, dimmestbulb: the radius of the outer (front) grid is
larger than the radius of the inner (rear) grid. Howard is absolutely
correct: the diaphragm *must* be "changing size" in order for there

to
be an increase in the horizontal dispersion (without an increase in
distortions). This would require "perfect elasticity" of the

diaphragm
material over it's excursion.


OK you are as dumb as Ferstler. Congradulations.



Scott Wheeler