"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...
From:
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:19:02 GMT

Perhaps, but there seems to be some reason to think it's accurate.

Perhaps a strong predisposition on your part to believing that it's
true, based on several years of the Right berating the 'liberal media'?
What other 'reasons' are there? Please be specific. No quoting Rush
Limbaugh in your answer.

In any case, peer review will be interesting.

There won't be any. That's how the Right works.

What are you talking about? By peer review I meant other researchers.

A quick sound bite,
then off to new attacks elsewhere. Even if there is a peer review
nobody will recall the report by the time it's complete. If nothing
else, the Republicans are very slick marketers.

The study was done by UCLA, not known for their right wing agenda.

This guy wrote for _American Spectator_ and wants to be taken seriously
as an unbiased investigator? And you swallow it whole? LOL!

I gave reasons why I thought the report sounded plausible.


Have Ann Coultier, Sean Hannity, Karl Rove or Rush peer review it. Or
maybe DeLay. He may have some spare time soon. Better yet, how about
Frist? Not only will he potentially also have some free time soon, but
he can diagnose brain dead people's prognosis from family videotape. He
wouldn't even need to read the report or study its method. Dick Cheney
can add commentary.

For an alleged libertarian you are sounding more and more like a shill
for the right.

And you sound like every other radical left winger.