From:
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:19:02 GMT

Perhaps, but there seems to be some reason to think it's accurate.

Perhaps a strong predisposition on your part to believing that it's
true, based on several years of the Right berating the 'liberal media'?
What other 'reasons' are there? Please be specific. No quoting Rush
Limbaugh in your answer.

In any case, peer review will be interesting.

There won't be any. That's how the Right works. A quick sound bite,
then off to new attacks elsewhere. Even if there is a peer review
nobody will recall the report by the time it's complete. If nothing
else, the Republicans are very slick marketers.

This guy wrote for _American Spectator_ and wants to be taken seriously
as an unbiased investigator? And you swallow it whole? LOL!

Have Ann Coultier, Sean Hannity, Karl Rove or Rush peer review it. Or
maybe DeLay. He may have some spare time soon. Better yet, how about
Frist? Not only will he potentially also have some free time soon, but
he can diagnose brain dead people's prognosis from family videotape. He
wouldn't even need to read the report or study its method. Dick Cheney
can add commentary.

For an alleged libertarian you are sounding more and more like a shill
for the right.