Better bandwidth than USB-2?
On 29/10/2019 8:50 am, Tobiah wrote:
What do you want increased throughput for?Â* For disks, USB3 is a
considerable
performance win.
--scott
I use synths and samplers, and sometimes monitor a guitar through
a VST effect, etc.Â* That's what the emphasis on latency is all about.
When I can, I use the hardware monitor on the interface.
I just thought that if the hose was pushing water a lot faster (USB3)
then the round trip would be faster.Â* It sounds like you guys are saying
that USB2.0 is fine, and that the latency comes from the CPU.
Not so much the CPU , unless severely lacking balls. More the OS,
driver, and application.
USB-whatever starts to get messy if you start loading more devices onto
a bus/controller though (but who does that anyway ?).
geoff
|