View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default Note for Mr. ****

wrote in message
ups.com

No, "eh". It comes naturally to what you are calling
"objectivists" (however, you're anything but
"objective"). The people you call "subjectivists (who
nevertheless do NOT follow subjectivist principles) are
generally NOT interested in "debates". They're interested
in discussion.


Inability to understand the natural overlap between discussions and debates
noted.

(I mean "normal" subjectivists. Not the
wayward slackers that hang around here...).


It is true that the quality of the local crop of subjectivist is very poor.
Unfortunately, they have low-lifes like Middius and Sackman bringng their
average intellectual capacity and interest in audio way down.

Perhaps its
because "normal audio subjectivists" realize you don't
get better sound by "debating" crap all day.


Well, lets tell the whole truth - one does not get better sound by just
talking about it. Note that unlike just about all of the subjectivist
slackers around here I actually do hands-on audio projects.


Nice talking to you Mr. Shhhh. Its good to see that we
agree about so many things.


You're not convincing me with that act. I think it makes
you downright miserable to agree with anyone about
anything.


Contrary to subjectivist religious beliefs, simply thinking something does
not make it so. Check the google archives, I've specifically voiced my
agreement with others on audio topics here more often than any other poster
on RAO.